Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in the Management of Arterial Stiffness and Target Organ Damage in Patients with Hypertension

Abstract Background Arterial stiffness and hypertension are strong predictors of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are first-line antihypertensive agents in reducing blood pressure and arterial stiffness. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the effects of ACEI and ARB in reducing arterial stiffness and preventing target organ damage in patients with hypertension. Methods This observational study included 654 participants who attend routine consultations at an outpatient hypertension clinic in 2 university hospitals. Patients were interviewed, and they underwent central and peripheral blood pressure measurements. Doppler echocardiography, carotid ultrasound, biochemical tests, and anthropometric parameters were carried out. Shapiro-Wilk, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test were used. A significance level of 5% was adopted. Results A total of 659 participants were evaluated in the study (398 from the ARB group and 256 from the ACEI group). Age, body mass index (BMI), central and peripheral blood pressure measurements, pulse wave velocity (PWV), left ventricular mass index, and carotid intima-media thickness did not show differences between the groups (p > 0.05). After linear regression analysis, the ACEI group had lower values of total vascular resistance (TVR) (p = 0.003) and augmentation pressure (p = 0.008), when compared to the ARB group. Conclusion This study showed that the ACEI group had a greater reduction in augmentation pressure and PWV. There were no differences between the groups regarding the improvement of outcomes related to central arterial pressure, PWV, and cardiac and vascular target organ damage.

Associação entre o Antagonismo do Sistema Renina-Angiotensina-Aldosterona e a Mortalidade Relacionada à COVID-19 em Pacientes com Hipertensão Relacionada ao Sobrepeso/Obesidade: um Estudo Retrospectivo de Coorte / Association between RAAS Antagonism and COVID-19-related Mortality in Patients with Overweight/Obesity-related Hypertension: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Resumo Fundamento Os bloqueadores dos receptores da angiotensina (BRA) e os inibidores da enzima conversora da angiotensina (IECA) aumentam a expressão de ACE2, que é um receptor para entrada de SARS-CoV-2 nas células. Embora as evidências sugiram que os IECA/BRA são seguros entre a população geral com COVID-19, sua segurança em pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade merece uma avaliação mais aprofundada. Objetivo Avaliamos a associação entre o uso de IECA/BRA e a gravidade da COVID-19 em pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade. Métodos O presente estudo incluiu 439 pacientes adultos com sobrepeso/obesidade (índice de massa corporal ≥ 25 kg/m2) e hipertensão, diagnosticados com COVID-19 e internados no University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic entre 1º de março e 7 de dezembro de 2020. Foram avaliadas a mortalidade e a gravidade da COVID-19 com base no tempo de internação hospitalar, internação em unidade de terapia intensiva, uso de oxigênio suplementar, ventilação mecânica e uso de vasopressores. A regressão logística multivariável foi usada para examinar as associações do uso de IECA/BRA com a mortalidade e outros marcadores de gravidade de COVID-19, com um alfa bilateral definido em 0,05. Resultados A exposição aos BRA (n = 91) e IECA (n = 149) antes da hospitalização foi significativamente associada a menor mortalidade ( odds ratio [OR] = 0,362, intervalo de confiança [IC] de 95% 0,149 a 0,880, p = 0,025) e menor tempo de internação hospitalar (IC 95% −0,217 a −0,025, p = 0,015). Adicionalmente, os pacientes em uso de IECA/BRA apresentaram uma tendência não significativa de menor internação em unidade de terapia intensiva (OR = 0,727, IC 95% 0,485 a 1,090, p = 0,123), uso de oxigênio suplementar (OR = 0,929, IC 95% 0,608 a 1,421,p = 0,734), ventilação mecânica (OR = 0,728, IC 95% 0,457 a 1,161, p = 0,182) e vasopressores (OR = 0,677, IC 95% 0,430 a 1,067, p = 0,093). Conclusão Os resultados sugerem que pacientes internados com COVID-19 e hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade que receberam IECA/BRA antes da internação apresentam menor mortalidade e COVID-19 menos grave do que aqueles que não estavam tomando IECA/BRA. Os resultados também sugerem que a exposição aos IECA/BRA pode proteger pacientes com hipertensão relacionada ao sobrepeso/obesidade de COVID-19 grave e morte.

Abstract Background Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) increase the expression of ACE2, which is a receptor for entry of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. Though evidence suggests that ARB/ACEI are safe among the general population with COVID-19, their safety in patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension deserves further evaluation. Objective We assessed the association between ARB/ACEI use and COVID-19 severity in patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension. Methods This study included 439 adult patients with overweight/obesity (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2) and hypertension, diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic from March 1 to December 7, 2020. Mortality and severity of COVID-19 were evaluated based on length of stay in hospital, intensive care unit admission, use of supplemental oxygen, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations of ARB/ACEI use with mortality and other markers of COVID-19 severity, with a two-sided alpha set at 0.05. Results Exposure to ARB (n = 91) and ACEI (n = 149) before hospitalization was significantly associated with lower mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.362, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.149 to 0.880, p = 0.025) and a shorter length of stay (95% CI −0.217 to −0.025, p = 0.015). Additionally, patients using ARB/ACEI showed a non-significant trend toward lower intensive care unit admission (OR = 0.727, 95% CI 0.485 to 1.090, p = 0.123), use of supplemental oxygen (OR = 0.929, 95% CI 0.608 to 1.421, p = 0.734), mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.728, 95% CI 0.457 to 1.161, p = 0.182), and vasopressors (OR = 0.677, 95% CI 0.430 to 1.067, p = 0.093). Conclusion Results suggest that hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and overweight/obesity-related hypertension who were prescribed ARB/ACEI before admission to the hospital exhibit lower mortality and less severe COVID-19 than those who were not taking ARB/ACEI. The results also suggest that exposure to ARB/ACEI may protect patients with overweight/obesity-related hypertension from severe COVID-19 and death.

The use of angiotensin receptor blockers in dementia prevention / O uso de bloqueadores de receptor de angiotensina na prevenção de demência

ABSTRACT: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia are preventable and highly prevalent diseases, as is systemic arterial hypertension. Thus, it is speculated that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may be neuroprotective against AD. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate if the use of ARBs confers a neuroprotective effect on AD, through a systematic review. Methods: Studies published on Embase, LILACS, SciELO, and PubMed were evaluated. The selection of the studies included those that evaluated the use of antihypertensive drugs in individuals with a previous diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. The data were extracted with the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) form. The risk of bias was evaluated by the EPOC "Risk of bias tool." Results: A total of 12 articles were identified, and 3 articles were selected. Two of them analyzed the use of ARB/ACEI versus other antihypertensives and the development of dementia. Conclusion: There is a tendency for ARBs to be superior to other antihypertensives in preventing dementia.

RESUMO: A doença de Alzheimer (DA) e a demência são doenças potencialmente preveníveis, assim como a hipertensão arterial sistêmica. Dessa forma, especula-se que os bloqueadores dos receptores de angiotensina (BRA) tenham efeito neuroprotetor contra a DA. Objetivo: Avaliar se o uso de BRA confere efeito neuroprotetor para DA, por meio de uma revisão sistemática. Métodos: Foram avaliados estudos publicados nas plataformas Embase, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (Lilacs), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) e United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed). Os estudos incluídos avaliaram o uso de anti-hipertensivos em indivíduos com diagnóstico prévio de comprometimento cognitivo leve. Os dados foram extraídos com base no formulário da EPOC. Risco de viés foi avaliado por meio da ferramenta da Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) "Risk of bias tool". Resultados: Foram encontrados 12 artigos e três foram selecionados. Dois analisaram o uso de BRA/IECA vs. o uso de outros anti-hipertensivos e o desenvolvimento de demência. Conclusão: Há uma tendência de que os BRA sejam superiores a outros anti-hipertensivos na prevenção da demência.

Uso previo de antagonistas de la angiotensina II en pacientes hipertensos hospitalizados y mortalidad por COVID-19

Introducción: Actualmente existe un gran interés en establecer la relación entre la severidad de la infección por SARS-COV-2 en pacientes hipertensos usuarios de antagonistas de la angiotensina II (ARAII). Objetivo: Estudiar la relación entre el uso previo de antagonistas de la ARA II en pacientes hipertensos y la mortalidad por COVID-19. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo en un hospital de referencia en Lima, Perú, en pacientes hipertensos hospitalizados en marzo del 2021 por COVID-19 severo. Resultados: Ingresaron al estudio 101 pacientes, con una media de edad de 70.1 + 12.0 y sexo masculino 48%. Los usuarios de ARAII fueron 45 (45.6%) y no los tomaban 56 (54.4%). El Índice de comorbilidad de Charlson fue mayor en el grupo ARAII (3.6 + 1.56 vs 3.04 + 1.24) (p<0.05). La mortalidad total y por sexo (varones vs mujeres), entre los que usaban ARAII o no, fueron 57.8% vs 62% (p = 0.633) y 36.36% vs 63.64 % (p<0.05), respectivamente. La media de la concentración de deshidrogenasa láctica fue menor en los que tomaban ARAII comparado con los no usuarios, 394.18 + 152.3 vs 503.5 + 252.7 (p<0.05); no se observó diferencia significativa en el recuento de leucocitos, niveles séricos de Proteína C Reactiva, Ferritina, dímero D y fibrinógeno. Conclusión: Entre los pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 con hipertensión, el uso previo de ARAII no se asoció con riesgo de mortalidad.

Background: There is caurrently great interest in establishing the relationship between the severity of SARS-COV-2 infection in hypertensive patients who use angiotensin II antagonists (AIIRAs). Objective: To study the relationship between the previous use of angiotensin II antagonists (ARB) in hypertensive patients and mortality from COVID-19. Materials and methods: A retrospective observational study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital in Lima, Peru, in hypertensive patients hospitalized in March 2021 for severe COVID-19. Results: A total of 101 patients entered the study, with a mean age of 70.1 + 12.0 and 48% male. ARB users and non-users were 45 (45.6%) and 56 (54.4%), respectively. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in the ARB group (3.6 + 1.56 vs 3.04 + 1.24) (p<0.05). Total and male vs women mortality, among those using ARBs or not, were 57.8% vs 62% (p = 0.633) and 36.36% vs 63.64% (p <0.05), respectively. Mean lactate dehydrogenase concentration was lower in those taking ARBs compared to non-users, 394.18 + 152.3 vs 503.5 + 252.7 (p<0.05); No significant difference was observed in the leukocyte count and serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, Ferritin, D-dimer and fibrinogen. Conclusion: Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hypertension, prior use of ARBSs was not associated with mortality risk.

Pharmacological treatment of scleroderma renal crisis: A systematic literature review / Tratamiento farmacológico de la crisis renal en esclerosis sistémica: una revisión sistemática de la literatura

ABSTRACT Background: Scleroderma renal crisis is a condition that affects approximately 4-6% of patients with systemic sclerosis, especially with diffuse compromise. Clinical manifestations are variable, representing a diagnostic challenge. Objective: The study aims to describe and analyze the different pharmacological treatments available for the management of scleroderma renal crisis. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was done based on observational studies and clinical trials about the treatment of scleroderma renal crisis, using monotherapy or combined therapy. The studies were identified using electronic scientific databases, including MEDLINE PUBMED and EMBASE, in English, published between January 1990 and August 2019. Results: Eleven studies were included (ten observational studies and one open clinical trial). Of them, seven were cohorts, one case series, and two case-control studies. Overall, 1113 patients were included in the analyzed studies. All studies used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as exposition, case definition, and/or comparison in the clinical trial. Regarding the need for dialysis, approximately 53.9% of patients required it temporarily or permanently. Approximately 6-27% of patients required temporal dialysis, and 19-78% required permanent dialysis. One-year survival range was between 64 and 84%; two-year survival was between 53 and 74%; five-year survival between 40 and 90%, and finally ten-year survival between 35 and 47%. Conclusions: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors continue to be the first line of treatment for scleroderma renal crisis by contributing to a decrease in short-term mortality. However, alternative therapeutic options are required as a high percentage of patients still require dialysis. Future clinical trials are necessary to assess the effectiveness and safety of different therapeutic options.

RESUMEN Introducción: La crisis renal es una condición que afecta aproximadamente a 4-6% de los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica, especialmente con compromiso difuso. Las manifestaciones clínicas son variables, representando un reto diagnóstico en la práctica clínica. Objetivo: El objetivo del estudio fue describir y analizar los diferentes tratamientos farmacológicos disponibles para el manejo de la crisis renal en esclerosis sistémica. Materiales y métodos: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura fue desarrollada con base en estudios observacionales y ensayos clínicos sobre el tratamiento de la crisis renal, utilizando monoterapia o terapias combinadas. Los estudios fueron identificados utilizando bases de datos científicas que incluyeron MEDLINE PUBMED y EMBASE, que estuvieran en inglés y publicados entre enero de 1990 y agosto de 2019. Resultados: Once estudios fueron incluidos (10 estudios observacionales y un ensayo clínico abierto). De estos, siete fueron cohortes, una serie de casos y dos estudios de casos y controles. En total, 1113 pacientes fueron incluidos en los estudios analizados. Todos los estudios utilizaron inhibidores de enzima convertidora de angiotensina como exposición, definición de caso y/o comparador en ensayo clínico. Sobre la necesidad de diálisis, aproximadamente 53,9% de los pacientes la requirieron de forma temporal o permanente. Aproximadamente 6-27% de pacientes requirieron diálisis temporal y 19-78% requirieron diálisis permanente. El rango de sobrevida al año fue de 64-84%; a dos arios 53-74%; a cinco arios 40-90%, y a diez arnos 35-47%. Conclusiones: Los inhibidores de enzima convertidora de angiotensina continúan siendo la primera línea de tratamiento de crisis renal en esclerosis sistémica, al contribuir en la reducción de la mortalidad a corto plazo. Sin embargo, opciones terapéuticas alternativas son requeridas, al continuar muy elevado el porcentaje de requerimiento de diálisis. Ensayos clínicos futuros son necesarios para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de diferentes opciones terapéuticas.

Effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on COVID-19: a narrative review of the literature / Efectos de bloqueadores del receptor de angiotensina II e inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina en COVID-19: una revisión narrativa de la literatura / Efeitos dos bloqueadores do receptor da angiotensina II e inibidores da enzima de conversão da angiotensina no COVID-19: uma revisão narrativa da literatura

Introduction: An outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is currently affec-ting worldwide. The association between this virus and the upregulation of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) has been suggested as a potential as an important factor in the development of Coronavirus Disease- 19 (COVID-19). Objective: To describe the relationship between some antihypertensive treatments and COVID-19. Methods: A research was conducted with the components of the PIO (Population, Intervention, Outcomes) strate-gy, including the literature of the last 20 years available in central PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases. All relevant articles that assessed the epidemiological relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and hyperten-sion, the treatment and outcomes of the patients who have this comorbidity, as well as the relationship between the RAA axis and COVID-19 were included in the analysis. Results: A total of 292 items were found in the databases. After a thorough analysis, 17 papers were selected, including in vitro and in vivo tests, clinical trials, and epidemiological studies related to the topic analyzed. Conclusion: Due to the systemic benefits of antihypertensive drugs targeting the RAA axis, and the lack of eviden-ce of these treatments being a risk factor, It is not recommended to withdraw these medications from hypertensive patients infected with SARS-CoV 2, unless there is a clinical indication.

Introducción: el surgimiento y diseminación del coronavirus tipo 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo (SARS-CoV-2), actualmente, afecta a la mayoría de los del mundo. La asociación entre este virus y la regulación positiva de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina 2 (ACE2) se ha sugerido como un factor potencial en el desarrollo de la enfermedad por coronavirus-19 (COVID- 19). Objetivo: describir la relación entre algunos tratamientos antihipertensivos y la COVID-19. Métodos: se revisaron los componentes de la estrategia PIO (población, intervención, resultados). Se incluyeron todos los artículos relevantes de los últimos 20 años disponibles en las bases de datos centrales PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus y Embase, que describen la relación epidemiológica entre SARS-CoV-2 e hipertensión, el tratamiento y el desenlace de los pacientes quienes tienen esta comor-bilidad, así como la relación entre el eje renina-angiotensina-aldosterona y COVID-19. Resultados: se encontraron inicialmente 292 artículos en las bases de datos, para finalmente seleccio-nar 17 artículos, incluyendo exámenes in vivo e in vitro, ensayos clínicos y estudios epidemiológicos relacionados con el tema analizado. Conclusión: debido a los beneficiosos efectos sistémicos del tratamiento antihipertensivo, cuyo blanco es el sistema renina-angiotensina- aldosterona, y a la falta de evidencia acerca de estos me-dicamentos en cuanto a la inducción de SARS-CoV-2, no se recomienda suspender o contraindicar el tratamiento con estos fármacos en pacientes hipertensos positivos para COVID-19, a menos que haya una indicación clínica

Introdução: Um surto de Síndrome Respiratória Aguda Grave Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) está afe-tando atualmente em todo o mundo. A associação entre esse vírus e a suprarregulação da Enzima Conversora da Angiotensina 2 (ACE2) tem sido sugerida como um fator potencial importante no de-senvolvimento da Doença do Coronavírus-19 (COVID-19). Objetivo: Descrever a relação entre al-guns tratamentos anti-hipertensivos e COVID-19. Métodos: Foi realizada uma pesquisa com os com-ponentes da estratégia Population, Intervention, Resultados (PIR), incluindo a literatura dos últimos 20 anos disponível nas bases de dados centrais PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus e Embase. Todos os artigos relevantes que avaliaram a relação epide-miológica entre SARS-CoV-2 e hipertensão, o trata-mento e resultados dos pacientes que apresentam essa comorbidade, bem como a relação entre o eixo RAA e COVID-19 foram incluídos na análise. Resultados: Foram encontrados 292 itens nas bases de dados. Após análise aprofundada, foram selecionados 17 artigos, entre testes in vitro e in vivo, en-saios clínicos e estudos epidemiológicos relacionados ao tema analisado. Conclusão: Devido aos be-nefícios sistêmicos dos medicamentos anti-hipertensivos direcionados ao eixo RAA e à falta de evi-dência desses tratamentos serem um fator de risco, não é recomendado retirar esses medicamentos de pacientes hipertensos infectados com SARS-CoV 2, a menos que haja um indicação clínica.

Comparison of First-Line Dual Combination Treatments in Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from Multinational Heterogeneous Cohorts

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: 2018 ESC/ESH Hypertension guideline recommends 2-drug combination as initial anti-hypertensive therapy. However, real-world evidence for effectiveness of recommended regimens remains limited. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of first-line anti-hypertensive treatment combining 2 out of the following classes: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor blocker (A), calcium channel blocker (C), and thiazide-type diuretics (D).METHODS: Treatment-naïve hypertensive adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD) who initiated dual anti-hypertensive medications were identified in 5 databases from US and Korea. The patients were matched for each comparison set by large-scale propensity score matching. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events as a composite outcome comprised the secondary measure.RESULTS: A total of 987,983 patients met the eligibility criteria. After matching, 222,686, 32,344, and 38,513 patients were allocated to A+C vs. A+D, C+D vs. A+C, and C+D vs. A+D comparison, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mortality during total of 1,806,077 person-years: A+C vs. A+D (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97−1.20; p=0.127), C+D vs. A+C (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87−1.01; p=0.067), and C+D vs. A+D (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.95−1.47; p=0.104). A+C was associated with a slightly higher risk of heart failure (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01−1.18; p=0.040) and stroke (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01−1.17; p=0.040) than A+D.CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in mortality among A+C, A+D, and C+D combination treatment in patients without previous CVD. This finding was consistent across multi-national heterogeneous cohorts in real-world practice.

Recomendación rápida sobre el uso de antihipertensivos IECA/ARA II en pacientes con riesgo o documentación de COVID-19 / Rapid recommendation on the use of ACEI/ARA antihypertensives in patients at risk or with documented COVID-19

Ciertos hallazgos preclínicos generaron preocupación en la comunidad científica y en la población general sobre el uso de inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina (IECA) y los antagonistas del receptor de la angiotensina II (ARAII), y los posibles desenlaces adversos asociados con relación a la infección por el nuevo Coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2).Por este motivo, nos planteamos como objetivo proveer de recomendaciones dinámicas (living recommendations) para el tratamiento con fármacos IECA o ARA II en pacientes con riesgo o documentación de infección por SARS-CoV-2 (en todo su espectro de gravedad). Se utilizó como metodología la adaptación/adopción de guías de práctica clínica bajo el enfoque GRADE, actualizando la evidencia al 7 de abril de 2020 mediante búsquedas en múltiples bases de datos y consultando a un panel multidisciplinario libre de conflictos de interés. Como resultado de este proceso se arribó a la siguiente afirmación: se recomienda, en contexto de la pandemia de COVID-19, en personas que se encuentran en tratamiento con IECA/ARAII, mantener el tratamiento sin cambios por sobre suspenderlo o reemplazarlo por otros fármacos (Recomendación fuerte a favor - calidad de evidencia baja). (AU)

Certain preclinical findings raised concerns in the scientific community and in the general population about the use ofangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (ARA) and the possible adverse outcomes associated with the infection with the new Coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2). For this reason, our objective is to provide living recommendations for treatment with ACEI or ARA in patients with risk or documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection (inall its severity spectrum). The adaptation/adoption of clinical practice guidelines under the GRADE approach was used as a methodology, updating the evidence as of April 7, 2020, by searching multiple databases and consulting a multidisciplinary panel free of conflicts of interest. As a result of this process, the following statement was reached: it is recommended, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, in people who are undergoing treatment with ACEI/ARA, to maintain the treatment unchanged instead of its suspension or replacement with other drugs (Strong recommendation in favor - low quality ofevidence). (AU)

Olmesartan is not associated with the risk of enteropathy: a Korean nationwide observational cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Olmesartan, a widely used angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), has been linked to sprue-like enteropathy. No cases of olmesartan-associated enteropathy have been reported in Northeast Asia. We investigated the associations between olmesartan and other ARBs and the incidence of enteropathy in Korea. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service to identify 108,559 patients (58,186 females) who were initiated on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis), olmesartan, or other ARBs between January 2005 and December 2012. The incidences of enteropathy were compared among drug groups. Changes in body weight were compared after propensity score matching of patients in the ACEis and olmesartan groups. RESULTS: Among 108,559 patients, 31 patients were diagnosed with enteropathy. The incidences were 0.73, 0.24, and 0.37 per 1,000 persons, in the ACEis, olmesartan, and other ARBs groups, respectively. Adjusted rate ratios for enteropathy were: olmesartan, 0.33 (95% confidential interval [CI], 0.10 to 1.09; p = 0.070) and other ARBs, 0.34 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.83; p = 0.017) compared to the ACEis group after adjustment for age, sex, income level, and various comorbidities. The post hoc analysis with matched cohorts revealed that the proportion of patients with significant weight loss did not differ between the ACEis and olmesartan groups. CONCLUSIONS: Olmesartan was not associated with intestinal malabsorption or significant body weight loss in the general Korean population. Additional large-scale prospective studies of the relationship between olmesartan and the incidence of enteropathy in the Asian population are needed.

Effects of Fimasartan/Amlodipine Fixed-Dose Combination on Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Infarct Size in Rat Myocardial Infarction Model / 전남의대학술지

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of fimasartan/amlodipine fixed-dosed combination (F/A) on left ventricle (LV) systolic function and infarct size in the rat myocardial infarction (MI) model. We induced MI in 20 rats by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery and they were divided into two groups [MI group (n=10) vs. MI+F/A 10 mg/kg group (n=10)]. F/A was administered for 28 days between day-7 and day-35 in the MI+F/A group and echocardiography was performed at day-7 and at day-35 after the induction of MI. Picrosirius red staining was performed to confirm the fibrotic tissue and infarct size was measured using image analysis program for Image J. At the 35-day follow-up, the LV ejection fraction (EF) was significantly higher (38.10±3.92% vs. 29.86±4.56%, p<0.001) and delta (day-35 minus day-7) EF was significantly higher (0.14±2.66% vs. −8.53±2.66%. p<0.001) in the MI+F/A group than the MI group. Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the MI+F/A group than the MI group (103.23±13.35 mmHg vs. 123.43±14.82 mmHg, p<0.01). The MI+F/A group had a smaller infarct size (26.84±5.31% vs. 36.79±3.10%, p<0.01) than the MI group at the 35-day follow-up. Oral administration of F/A 10 mg/kg could improve LV systolic function and reduce infarct size in a rat MI model.

Therapeutic Effect of Fimasartan in a Rat Model of Myocardial Infarction Evaluated by Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography with ¹⁸FFPTP / 전남의대학술지

We evaluated the efficacy of fimasartan on perfusion defects and infarction size in an animal model of myocardial infarction (MI), with echocardiography and positron emission tomography (PET) using a ¹⁸F-labeled phosphonium cation (5-[¹⁸F]-fluoropentyl-triphenylphosphonium salt, [¹⁸F]FPTP) as a mitochondrial voltage sensor for myocardial imaging. We induced MI in 33 rats by ligation of the left coronary artery, and checked their cardiac PET image using [¹⁸F]FPTP for evaluation of myocardial perfusion. Rats were grouped into 3 groups according to their administered drugs: no drug (n=11), fimasartan 3 mg/kg (n=10), and fimasartan 10 mg/kg (n=12). Each designated drug was administered for 4 weeks, and follow-up PET and histologic examinations were done. In the PET analysis, a perfusion defect size was markedly improved in fimasartan 10 mg/kg group (35.9±7.0% to 28.4±6.9%, p<0.001), whereas treatment with fimasartan 3 mg/kg induced only an insignificant reduction of perfusion defect size (35.9±7.9% to 33.9±7.3%, p=0.095). Using 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, infarction size was the largest in the control group (36.5±8.3%), and was insignificantly lower in the fimasartan 3 mg/kg group (31.5±6.5%, p for the difference between the control group=0.146) and was significantly lower in the fimasartan 10 mg/kg group (26.3±7.6%, p for the difference between the control group=0.011). PET imaging using a ¹⁸F-labeled mitochondrial voltage sensor, [¹⁸F]FPTP, is useful in evaluation and monitoring of myocardial perfusion states, and treatment with fimasartan decreases the infarction size in animal MI model.

The application of non-selective β-blockers, angiotensin receptor antagonists and statins in liver cirrhotic patients / 中华肝脏病杂志

Portal hypertension is the major cause of complications in decompensated liver cirrhosis. Research results showed that non-selective β-blockers, angiotensin receptor antagonists, and statins can improve portal hypertension by reducing portal vein blood flow and intrahepatic resistance, and have certain prevention and treatment effect on hemodynamic disorders and portal hypertensive complications in chronic liver diseases. Herein, we review the mechanism of action, clinical effects and limitations of these three types of drugs on portal hypertension of cirrhosis.

Efficacy of low-dose spironolactone on top of angiotensin receptor blockade in patients with glomerulonephritis

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that aldosterone antagonists have a proteinuria-lowering effect in patients with proteinuria and progressive proteinuric disease not adequately controlled by the use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Aldosterone antagonists, in combination with ARBs, might improve proteinuria in patients with glomerulonephritis (GN). METHODS: In the present retrospective study, we evaluated the proteinuria-lowering effect and drug safety of low-dose spironolactone (12.5 mg/day) in 42 patients with GN being treated with an ARB. RESULTS: Proteinuria decreased from a mean total-protein-to-creatinine (TP/Cr) ratio of 592.3 ± 42.0 mg/g at baseline to 335.6 ± 43.3 mg/g after three months of treatment with spironolactone (P < 0.001). After the initial three months, the mean TP/Cr ratio increased progressively at six, nine, and 12 months; however, it was still less than the baseline value (P = 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). Although serum Cr levels increased significantly at three and nine months compared with baseline (P = 0.036 and 0.026, respectively), there was no time effect of treatment (P = 0.071). Serum potassium levels tended to increase with time (P = 0.118), whereas systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased with time (P = 0.122 and 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSION: Low-dose spironolactone in combination with an ARB reduced proteinuria in patients with GN, which could represent a novel treatment option in individuals whose proteinuria is not optimally controlled by the use of ARBs alone.

Urinary cytokine profiles according to the site of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in nephrectomized rats / Perfil de citocinas urinárias de acordo com o local de bloqueio do sistema renina angiotensina em ratos nefrectomizados

Abstract Introduction: It is still unknown how the pharmacological inhibition of the Renin Angiotensin System (RAS) impacts the levels of inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers. Objective: This study sought to evaluate the effect of enalapril, candesartan and aliskiren on urinary levels of cytokines in a model of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Male Wistar rats were submitted to surgical removal of ¾ of renal parenchyma to induce CKD (¾ nephrectomy), or subjected to sham surgery (control). Animals were then randomized into five groups: Sham surgery receiving vehicle; ¾ Nephrectomy receiving vehicle; ¾ Nephrectomy receiving enalapril (10 mg/kg); ¾ Nephrectomy receiving candesartan (10 mg/kg) and ¾ Nephrectomy receiving aliskiren (10 mg/kg). Urine output, water intake, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and urinary concentrations of creatinine, urea, albuminuria, Na+, K+, interleukin (IL) -1β, IL-6, IL-10 and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) were measured. Results: Nephrectomy significantly impaired renal function, increased MAP and altered the levels of all evaluated cytokines in urine. Enalapril, candesartan and aliskiren improved renal function and decreased MAP and IL-6 when compared to vehicle-treated nephrectomized group. Candesartan and aliskiren decreased IL-1β, while only candesartan reduced TGF-β and only aliskiren increased IL-10. Conclusion: Enalapril, candesartan and aliskiren presented similar effects on improving renal function and reducing MAP and urinary levels of IL-6 in rats with CKD. On the other hand, cytokine profile differed according to the treatment, suggesting that differential mechanisms were triggered in response to the site of RAS blockade.

Resumo Introdução: Ainda não se sabe como a inibição farmacológica do Sistema Renina Angiotensina (SRA) afeta os níveis de biomarcadores de inflamação e fibrose. Objetivo: Este estudo pretendeu avaliar o efeito de enalapril, candesartan e alisquireno sobre os níveis urinários de citocinas em um modelo de doença renal crônica (DRC). Métodos: Ratos Wistar machos foram submetidos à remoção cirúrgica de ¾ do parênquima renal para induzir DRC (nefrectomia), ou submetidos à cirurgia fictícia (controle). Animais foram então randomizados em cinco grupos: Cirurgia fictícia recebendo veículo; Nefrectomia recebendo veículo; Nefrectomia recebendo enalapril (10 mg/kg); Nefrectomia recebendo candesartan (10 mg/kg) e Nefrectomia recebendo alisquireno (10 mg/kg). Débito urinário, ingesta hídrica, pressão arterial media (PAM) e concentrações urinárias de creatinina, ureia, albumina, Na+, K+, interleucina (IL) -1β, IL-6, IL-10 e fator de transformação e crescimento beta (TGF-β) foram medidas. Resultados: A nefrectomia comprometeu significativamente a função renal, aumentou a PAM e alterou os níveis de todas as citocinas avaliadas na urina. Enalapril, candesartan e alisquireno melhoraram a função renal e diminuíram a PAM e a IL-6 quando comparado aos grupo de animais nefrectomizados tratados com veículo. Candesartan e alisquireno reduziram IL-1β, enquanto somente candesartan diminuiu o TGF-β e somente alisquireno aumentou a IL-10. Conclusão: Enalapril, candesartan e alisquireno apresentaram efeitos similares em relação à melhora da função renal e redução da PAM e dos níveis urinários de IL-6 em ratos com DRC. Por outro lado, o perfil de citocinas diferiu de acordo com o tratamento, sugerindo que diferentes mecanismos sejam desencadeados em resposta ao local de bloqueio do SRA.

Schistosoma mansoni associated glomerulopathy with IgA mesangial deposits: case report / Glomerulopatia esquistossomótica com depósitos mesangiais de IgA: relato de caso

Abstract Introduction: Renal involvement is a severe form of schistosomiasis and occurs in 10% to 15% of patients with the hepatosplenic form of the disease. Nephrotic syndrome is the most common clinical presentation. It is a complication caused by immune complexes (IC), it is rare to appear in the Brazilian context with a immunoglobulin A (IgA) deposits. When installed the renal injury by Schistosoma mansoni, classically presents as membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (mesangiocapillary) with lobular accentuation. Objective: To report a case of schistosomiasis nephropathy that appeared 7 years after treatment of hepatosplenic schistosomiasis with histologic pattern of mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis with IgA deposits in mesangium. Clinically developed with progressive decrease of proteinuria with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Method: It was reported a case of a 36 years old patient, brown, with classical sintoms of nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria > 3.5 g/24h, hypoalbuminemia and hypercholesterolemia), however with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis history 7 years ago and portal hypertension. Patient underwent renal biopsy which showed IgA deposits in mesangial, being more intense than immunoglobulin G (IgG), accompanied by C1q and C3, with 4/13 glomeruli sclerotic, standard light mesangial glomerulonephritis renal injury with IgA deposits. Patient began taking ARB with progressive improvement in proteinuria. Conclusion: Patients with glomerulonephritis by schistosoma don't show improvement of disease progression with antiparasitic treatment. However the anti-proteinuric treatment can slow the progression of end stage kidney disease.

Resumo Introdução: O acometimento renal é uma forma grave da esquistossomose e ocorre em 10% a 15% dos pacientes com a forma hepatoesplênica da doença. A síndrome nefrótica é a apresentação clínica mais comum. Trata-se de uma complicação causada por imunocomplexos (IC), sendo rara no contexto brasileiro apresentar-se com depósitos de imunoglobulina A (IgA). Quando instalada a lesão renal pelo Schistosoma mansoni, apresenta-se classicamente como glomerulonefrite membranoproliferativa (mesangiocapilar), com acentuação lobular. Objetivo: Relatar caso de glomerulopatia esquistossomótica que se apresentou 7 anos após tratamento de esquistossomose hepatoesplênica com padrão histológico de glomerulonefrite proliferativa mesangial com depósitos de IgA em mesângio. Clinicamente, evoluiu com diminuição progressiva de proteinúria com bloqueador do receptor de angiotensina (BRA). Método: Foi relatado caso de paciente com 36 anos, parda, com quadro clássico de síndrome nefrótica (proteinúria > 3,5 g/24h, hipoalbuminemia e hipercolesterolemia), no entanto, com histórico de esquistossomose hepatoesplênica há 7 anos e com hipertensão portal. Paciente foi submetida à biópsia renal, que apresentou depósitos de IgA em mesângio, sendo mais intensos que imunoglobulina G (IgG), acompanhados de C1q e C3, com 4/13 glomérulos esclerosados, padrão de lesão renal de glomerulopatia mesangial leve com depósitos de IgA. Paciente iniciou uso de BRA, com melhora progressiva da proteinúria. Conclusão: Pacientes com glomerulopatia por schistosoma não apresentam melhora da progressão da doença com tratamento antiparasitário. Entretanto, o tratamento antiproteinúrico pode retardar a progressão da doença renal crônica terminal.

Resistive index as a predictor of renal progression in patients with moderate renal dysfunction regardless of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist medication

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that a higher resistive index (RI) on renal duplex ultrasonography was related with renal progression and acute kidney injury, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARB). We evaluated whether a RI value is a predictive factor for renal progression regardless of ACEI or ARB medication in patients with moderate renal dysfunction. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 119 patients with moderate renal dysfunction that had been evaluated with renal duplex ultrasonography from February 2011 to April 2015. Moderate renal dysfunction was defined as a stage 3 to 4 CKD. Renal progression was defined as a doubling of the baseline serum creatinine (sCr), a decrease of baseline glomerular filtration rate by > 50%, or initiation of renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.7 ± 11.0 years and sCr level was 2.1 ± 1.2 mg/dL. The RI ≥ 0.79 group showed a higher incidence of renal progression (P = 0.004, log-rank test) compared with the RI < 0.79 group, irrespective of ACEI or ARB usage. In the Cox proportional hazard model, RI ≥ 0.79 was an independent prognostic factor after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, sCr, proteinuria, and use of ACEI or ARB (hazard ratio, 4.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–22.53; P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: RI ≥ 0.79 on the renal duplex ultrasonography can be a helpful predictor for renal progression in patients with moderate renal dysfunction, regardless of their ACEI or ARB usage.

Effect of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockage in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Case Control Study / 대한중환자의학회지

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a life-threatening disease. Many patients with ARDS do not recover fully, and progress to terminal lung fibrosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor is known to modulate the neurohormonal system to reduce inflammation and to prevent tissue fibrosis. However, the role of ACE inhibitor in the lungs is not well understood. We therefore conducted this study to elucidate the effect of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockage on the prognosis of patients with ARDS. METHODS: We analyzed medical records of patients who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care hospital from January 2005 to December 2010. ARDS was determined using the Berlin definition. The primary outcome was the mortality rate of ICU. Survival analysis was performed after adjustment using propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included in the study. Thirty-seven patients (20.3%) took ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) during ICU admission, and 145 (79.7%) did not; both groups showed similar severity scores. In the ICU, mortality was 45.9% in the RAS inhibitor group and 58.6% in the non-RAS inhibitor group (P = 0.166). The RAS inhibitor group required a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (29.5 vs. 19.5, P = 0.013) and longer ICU stay (32.1 vs. 20.2 days, P < 0.001). In survival analysis, the RAS inhibitor group showed better survival rates than the non-RAS group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ACE inhibitor or ARB may have beneficial effect on ARDS patients.

Effect of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockage in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Case Control Study / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a life-threatening disease. Many patients with ARDS do not recover fully, and progress to terminal lung fibrosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor is known to modulate the neurohormonal system to reduce inflammation and to prevent tissue fibrosis. However, the role of ACE inhibitor in the lungs is not well understood. We therefore conducted this study to elucidate the effect of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockage on the prognosis of patients with ARDS. METHODS: We analyzed medical records of patients who were admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care hospital from January 2005 to December 2010. ARDS was determined using the Berlin definition. The primary outcome was the mortality rate of ICU. Survival analysis was performed after adjustment using propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included in the study. Thirty-seven patients (20.3%) took ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) during ICU admission, and 145 (79.7%) did not; both groups showed similar severity scores. In the ICU, mortality was 45.9% in the RAS inhibitor group and 58.6% in the non-RAS inhibitor group (P = 0.166). The RAS inhibitor group required a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (29.5 vs. 19.5, P = 0.013) and longer ICU stay (32.1 vs. 20.2 days, P < 0.001). In survival analysis, the RAS inhibitor group showed better survival rates than the non-RAS group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ACE inhibitor or ARB may have beneficial effect on ARDS patients.

Therapeutic effects of angiotensin receptor blocker irbesartan on hypertension and its compliance / 心血管康复医学杂志

Objective: To explore therapeutic effects of angiotensin receptor blocker (irbesartan) on hypertension and its compliance.Methods: A total of 200 cases with hypertension treated in our hospital were selected, randomly and equally divided into atenolol group and irbesartan group.Therapeutic effect, levels of blood pressure and blood lipids, and hemodynamic indexes were compared between two groups after treatment.Results:After treatment, total effective rate of irbesartan group was significantly higher than that of atenolol group (98.0% vs.72.0%, P=0.001).Compared with atenolol group, there were significant reductions in systolic blood pressure [(131.5±8.4)mmHg vs.(122.2±7.5) mmHg], diastolic blood pressure [(122.2±7.5)mmHg vs.(83.6±4.4) mmHg],blood triglyceride level [(7.5±1.5)mmol/L vs.(5.2±1.2)mmol/L], whole blood high shear viscosity [(6.7±0.7)mPa·s vs.(6.1±0.4)mPa·s], whole blood low shear viscosity [(10.5±0.7) mPa s vs.(9.2±0.6)mPa s] and plasma high shear viscosity [(1.9±0.2) mPa s vs.(1.5±0.1) mPa s] in irbesartan group, P<0.01 all.Therapeutic compliance of irbesartan group was significantly higher than that of atenolol group (95.0% vs.63.0%, P=0.001).Conclusion: Angiotensin receptor blockers irbesartan possess significant therapeutic effect on patients with hypertension.It is safe and reliable with high compliance, which is worth extending.